Patient education tool | informatic | Herzing University–Minneapolis
You will design a patient education tool that can be used by nurses for teaching patients using computer applications. You will then present your tool to the class and explain the purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness of this patient education. This presentation is 5-10 minutes.
NM 208 Patient Education Project ToolNM 208 Patient Education Project ToolCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Computer Applications20.0 to >17.0 ptsHigh ProficiencyCreative, innovative, effective use of computer applications17.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High ProficiencyEffective use of computer applications14.0 to >10.0 ptsProficient PointsIneffective use of computer use of applications10.0 to >0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientLacking use of computer applications20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization20.0 to >17.0 ptsHigh ProficiencyExtremely well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the project17.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High ProficiencyWell organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another and conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the project14.0 to >10.0 ptsProficient PointsSomewhat organized; ideas were not presented coherently and transitions were not always smooth, which at times distracted the audience10.0 to >0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientChoppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow transitions of ideas were abrupt and seriously distracted the audience20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Accuracy20.0 to >17.0 ptsHigh Proficiency100 % of the facts are accurate17.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High Proficiency99-90% of the facts are accurate14.0 to >10.0 ptsProficient Points89-80% of the facts are accurate10.0 to >0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientFewer than 80% of facts are accurate20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch20.0 to >17.0 ptsHigh ProficiencyWent above and beyond to research information; solicited material in addition to what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance project; and utilized variety of resources to make project effective17.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High ProficiencyDid a very good job of researching; utilized materials provided to their full potential; solicited adequate resources to enhance project; at time took the initiative to find information outside of school.14.0 to >10.0 ptsProficient PointsUsed the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not consult any additional resources10.0 to >0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientDid not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the topic20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreativity20.0 to >17.0 ptsHigh ProficiencyWas extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique approach that truly enhanced the project17.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High ProficiencyWas clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented14.0 to >10.0 ptsProficient PointsAdded a few original touches to enhance the project but did not incorporate them throughout10.0 to >0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientLittle creative energy used during this project; was bland, predictable, and lacked “zip”20.0 pts Total Points: 100.0PreviousNext